首页> 外文OA文献 >Fiction access points across computer-mediated book information sources: A comparison of online bookstores, reader advisory databases, and public library catalogs.
【2h】

Fiction access points across computer-mediated book information sources: A comparison of online bookstores, reader advisory databases, and public library catalogs.

机译:跨计算机媒介书籍信息源的小说访问点:在线书店,读者咨询数据库和公共图书馆目录的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of a librarian's more difficult jobs may be helping patrons in an elusive search for a "good book." A variety of online sources are now available to help readers and librarians in their search, but the descriptive capabilities of the resources vary widely. Library and information science (LIS) literature has suggested many schemes and access points for fiction classification. This study compared the records for identical books in a variety of computer-mediated book information sources (CMBIS) in order to find out which resources utilized the access points identified in LIS literature. Results from this study suggest that online bookstores may be effective tools for librarians helping patrons find "good" books, due to their increased use of access points. However, reader advisory databases, which contain reviews and subject headings, are occasionally more effective than online bookstores for identifying books published prior to the 1990s.
机译:图书馆员最艰巨的工作之一可能是帮助顾客难以捉摸的寻找“好书”。现在可以使用各种在线资源来帮助读者和图书馆员进行搜索,但是资源的描述能力差异很大。图书馆和信息科学(LIS)文献提出了许多小说分类的方案和访问点。这项研究比较了各种计算机媒介书籍信息源(CMBIS)中相同书籍的记录,以便找出哪些资源利用了LIS文献中确定的访问点。这项研究的结果表明,由于增加了访问点的使用,在线书店可能是图书馆员帮助顾客找到“好书”的有效工具。但是,包含评论和主题词的读者咨询数据库有时比在线书店更有效地识别1990年代之前出版的图书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号